Affiliate since: 12/31/1969, Power Rank: 99999999

I am new to this but as I understand it I believe developing EA's is the most important. Then having them duplicate the same process and develop their new recruits in the same manner. When I hit send it says it is a serious ethical problem if any of my answer has part of any other answer supplied. I have not looked at any other answers nor am I concerned what the other answers are. This is my viewpoint and opinion.

Affiliate since: 09/01/2014, Power Rank: 99999999 | Read rizzi's 2 other Ask SC answers

Answering this question and 'easy in my opinion, my point of view and' that to statistics, more 'contacts you have, the more' successful 'insured. That is: in a year I contacted 1,000 new PSA personally, statistical wants that 10% of them and 'production, therefore will be new ea.idem for PSA accredited in various ways, such as auctions, S.Building, PSA to go, the statistical and 'valid for them, even if the factor of direct recruitment has more' percentage, since they are definitely people close to you or acquaintances, Daltro singing the assigned are not in a position to direct knowledge and this leads to their statistical 5%.
Moral ?! I advise you to work in both solutions since 'both will give you the results !!! I hope I was helpful with my answer. I wish you a good job !!
less

Answering this question and 'easy in my opinion, my point of view and' that to statistics, more 'contacts you have, the more' successful 'insured. That is: in a year I contacted 1,000 new PSA personally, statistical wants that 10% of them and 'production, therefore will be new ea.idem for PSA accredited in various ways, such as auctions, S.Building, PSA to go, the statistical and 'valid for them, even if the factor of direct recruitment has more' percentage, since they are definitely people close
...more

Affiliate since: 07/05/2024, Power Rank: 99999999 | Read Miljana's 9 other Ask SC answers

After registering the SFI in, go in solving tasks, first listen to the video, berry 500 VP, then another 200 VP
Stand there and then in the first month doing just daily and weekly yadatke do not do it because your Intermediate maybe can cost as little fairy investment in the second month, I did not want to listen spony and yet I resolved not to give up and bought VP for further be the first month above the green line

Affiliate since: 06/22/2014, Power Rank: 99999999 | Read Lashunda's 18 other Ask SC answers

In my opinion, sponsoring a smaller number of EAs would be a better goal. PSAs may sign up but might not do any work. No work means no commission for you.

When PSAs make the rank of EA, you automatically receive 45% of what they buy in their Tripleclicks store. I hope this answer helps!

Much success headed your way!!!

Affiliate since: 12/31/1969, Power Rank: 99999999

I think as an action based strategy you should personally focus on promoting and marketing to find new PSA'S for yourself.

However i'd be just as happy having a top performing CSA in my group.


You have to understand that like most businesses SFI is basically a numbers game, basically if you can expose the opportunity to enough of the right type of people you will occasionally find a motivated affiliate, do this a few times over and before you know it you have a self growing business.

On the flip side, even though someone has signed up, often people are sometimes not ready right now or may have other options that they are confident will provide a vehicle to get their goals. When these people were exposed to SFI they obviously could see enough in the programme to at least join up rather than pass and most likely miss the opportunity. A good idea is always a good idea.

So in theory If we were lucky enough to go out and find 10 good people who became PSA'S Team Leaders and were ready willing and able to dedicated the effort to make SFI a residual wealth vehicle right now we would all be smiling and jumping for joy with money bulging out our pockets in a very short time frame.

Unfortunately though the chances of finding 10 people like that in succession is as likely as winning the lottery. Once you understand that even a go getting entrepreneur may not be ready for SFI right mow, (this doesn't mean that they never will be ready.) -you'll see the benefit of working with people who are thinking like you regardless of how much commission you receive. You will benefit and develop as a result of working in a team with good people and that is a pretty good recipe for success.


So in conclusion personally I would much rather have one go getting keen and active CSA over 10 PSA'S who may not be ready right now. Sure 15% commissions for a CSA is less than 45% but zero is less than both. Be grateful for having a person who is keen and active regardless of their rank. You'll benefit in the end many times over in both cases so long as you keep doing the basics and hang in there until success knocks on your door.
less

I think as an action based strategy you should personally focus on promoting and marketing to find new PSA'S for yourself.

However i'd be just as happy having a top performing CSA in my group.


You have to understand that like most businesses SFI is basically a numbers game, basically if you can expose the opportunity to enough of the right type of people you will occasionally find a motivated affiliate, do this a few times over and before you know it you have a self growing
...more

Affiliate since: 03/20/2013, Power Rank: 99999999 | Read Steve's 8 other Ask SC answers

What would be the better goal and why?

My answer would be yes. Why? You need to sponsor many new a PSAs to be able to find the smaller number of people you can train to be and to develop EAs themselves.

Let me refer you to LAUNCH PAD lesson #16, THE BIG FUNNEL. If you are advertizing, then you will, undoubtedly, sponsor a lot of people who join out of curiosity. You will have a lot of people who will not do a thing. Consider this as the large end of the funnel. Coming out of the small end, however, are the people who are willing to work, that you can train.

My advice is to continue sponsoring and work with the workers to build their business.
less

What would be the better goal and why?

My answer would be yes. Why? You need to sponsor many new a PSAs to be able to find the smaller number of people you can train to be and to develop EAs themselves.

Let me refer you to LAUNCH PAD lesson #16, THE BIG FUNNEL. If you are advertizing, then you will, undoubtedly, sponsor a lot of people who join out of curiosity. You will have a lot of people who will not do a thing. Consider this as the large end of the funnel. Coming out of
...more

Affiliate since: 01/23/2014, Power Rank: 99999999 | Read Vanda's 3 other Ask SC answers

If you are doing so to gain the greatest possible number of members, you have the task to each write every day how they work. You lead him on the path to reach the level of EA and EA2, then you also had some benefit. You get 100 VP. He also builds forms part of the new members and you lead so that every day look at his page VP Ledger.

Keep your member of your team and aware that only it can move up in business.

So be persistent and enroll new members and leads them!