More than is one better than the other I would say that you are guaranteed a specific number of PSAs in PSAs to go whereas there is no guarantee with S-Builder. In my experience you get between 3 and 5 affiliates with S_Builder and it can take several weeks to get them.
With PSAs to go you get a guaranteed number of PSAs and you normally get them in a relatively quick space of time.
In my experience the S-Builder PSAs that are received are of a better quality, (work wise), than those from PSA to go. I can only assume that the PSA to go are from a cheaper advertising product than the S-Builder.
So which is better and why? My vote would have to go to the S-Builder co-op PSAs purely on quality and not quantity.
More than is one better than the other I would say that you are guaranteed a specific number of PSAs in PSAs to go whereas there is no guarantee with S-Builder. In my experience you get between 3 and 5 affiliates with S_Builder and it can take several weeks to get them.
With PSAs to go you get a guaranteed number of PSAs and you normally get them in a relatively quick space of time.
In my experience the S-Builder PSAs that are received are of a better quality, (work wise), ...more
Hi,
This question is a good one. Both products are effective in building your downline. The S-builder is great to automatically get PSA's and you can motivate your existing PSA's by including them in your S-builder program when they maintain their Executive Affilate (EA) status every month. PSA's to go you can get PSA's every month and you can transfer PSA's to your active PSA's using the geneology page.
Therefore, both products are effective and can potentially grow your business in a short amount of time with less efforts. I would recommend both if you want speedy results with less efforts as possible.
less
Hi,
This question is a good one. Both products are effective in building your downline. The S-builder is great to automatically get PSA's and you can motivate your existing PSA's by including them in your S-builder program when they maintain their Executive Affilate (EA) status every month. PSA's to go you can get PSA's every month and you can transfer PSA's to your active PSA's using the geneology page.
Therefore, both products are effective and can potentially grow your business ...more
S-Builder Co-op and PSA To Go are two tools that help you form your team and help team members to form his and her team. In fact all of us in SFI we want to build a profitable business and a residual income. Their implementation is based on finding those tools that can help, and S-Builder Co-op and PSA To Go are those tools. I do not think you can choose between them. Each of them will help you form your team and then to work with the team and help them form their turn and her team.
I use and I recommend S-Builder is the tool that helps you form your team. It is particularly useful when you have experience in advertising. It is one of the ways to get PSA and PSA often quality. Using S-Builder brings you every month around 4-5 PSA for a cost of only $ 0.72. It remains for you to decide which of these tools are helpful you .All the best!
less
S-Builder Co-op and PSA To Go are two tools that help you form your team and help team members to form his and her team. In fact all of us in SFI we want to build a profitable business and a residual income. Their implementation is based on finding those tools that can help, and S-Builder Co-op and PSA To Go are those tools. I do not think you can choose between them. Each of them will help you form your team and then to work with the team and help them form their turn and her team.
I use ...more
In my opinion S-Builders is better. Both are at your own risk options though. They will both provide PSA's but they both provide ones that may or may not be active.
Reason I say S-Builders is because, although it may take a while longer to actually start seeing any sign ups you have the chance to not only get PSA's but also PRM's for your TC store. This in my opinion is the best way to go as I have found that advertising I can get plenty of PSA's but almost no PRM's. So far using S-Builders I have gotten 2 PRM's. Very good trade off for the wait I think.
less
In my opinion S-Builders is better. Both are at your own risk options though. They will both provide PSA's but they both provide ones that may or may not be active.
Reason I say S-Builders is because, although it may take a while longer to actually start seeing any sign ups you have the chance to not only get PSA's but also PRM's for your TC store. This in my opinion is the best way to go as I have found that advertising I can get plenty of PSA's but almost no PRM's. So far using S-Builders ...more
This question is better snswered by those who have tried both methods. So based on testimonies of those Affiliates, here are their most common comments:
1. S-BUILDER is a cheaper option than PSA to go st 0.72c a day but there is no guarantee of sign-ups and no guarantee that signups will become active.
2. PSA to go is a bit more expensive, but gives you guaranteed PSAs. However, the quality of these PSAs is neither guaranteed.
Hence, the choice is on one's decision and the best thing to do is try each one at a time.
This question is better snswered by those who have tried both methods. So based on testimonies of those Affiliates, here are their most common comments:
1. S-BUILDER is a cheaper option than PSA to go st 0.72c a day but there is no guarantee of sign-ups and no guarantee that signups will become active.
2. PSA to go is a bit more expensive, but gives you guaranteed PSAs. However, the quality of these PSAs is neither guaranteed.
Hence, the choice is on one's decision and the best ...more
The goal of network business is to sponsor people as the number game works. So PSAs and S-Builder both contribute towards increasing the sponsoring of the affiliates.
As per my experience, I go for PSAs for my personal sponsoring and I go for S-Builder to encourage my group leaders to get the advantage of sponsoring Personal Affiliates.
Its only managing the things and putting it in a right perspective.
I hope this is made clear and using the right tool for the right actions is the only way to success.
There is no question whether this is better or that one.
The goal of network business is to sponsor people as the number game works. So PSAs and S-Builder both contribute towards increasing the sponsoring of the affiliates.
As per my experience, I go for PSAs for my personal sponsoring and I go for S-Builder to encourage my group leaders to get the advantage of sponsoring Personal Affiliates.
Its only managing the things and putting it in a right perspective.
I hope this is made clear and using the right tool for the right actions ...more
A lot of people in my down line have asked me the same question. The answer is not a yes or no type.
The difference between the two is in both prize and guaranty.
Where PSA to go guaranty you a number of new affiliates, Co-Op does not. On the other hand Co-Op is often cheaper than PSA to Go. Also the results from Co-Op are taking longer. What they both have in common is the fact that they don't guaranty that the sign-ups will be(come) active. So, when you look for predictable quantity, go for PSA to Go. Are you looking for an affordable way to advertise, go for Co-Op.
A lot of people in my down line have asked me the same question. The answer is not a yes or no type.
The difference between the two is in both prize and guaranty.
Where PSA to go guaranty you a number of new affiliates, Co-Op does not. On the other hand Co-Op is often cheaper than PSA to Go. Also the results from Co-Op are taking longer. What they both have in common is the fact that they don't guaranty that the sign-ups will be(come) active. So, when you look for ...more
Personally, i think the two are the same but offers you the opportunity of choice.
S-Builder Co-op offers an advantage of cost to affiliate with low budget at just 72cent a day & yield result over a period of time, with little or no guarranty of the numbers of affiliate you may get.
While PSAs TO GO gives you the flexibility of having it almost immediately with the certainty in the numbers of affiliates you stand to gain.
However, there is no guarrantee over the qualities of the affiliates you get in both schemes.
less
Personally, i think the two are the same but offers you the opportunity of choice.
S-Builder Co-op offers an advantage of cost to affiliate with low budget at just 72cent a day & yield result over a period of time, with little or no guarranty of the numbers of affiliate you may get.
While PSAs TO GO gives you the flexibility of having it almost immediately with the certainty in the numbers of affiliates you stand to gain.
My question to you is, why do you want to limit yourself?
Both have there own pros and cons but one thing is for certain, we need a downline to be successful in this business and the more PSA's you have the better your chance of being successful.
I have been using both but for me personally S-Builder is the better option because, depending on how many shares you get, with a standing order you are going to get a steady stream of PSA's and not all of them at once.
Hope this answer is helpful, and good luck with your business.
less
My question to you is, why do you want to limit yourself?
Both have there own pros and cons but one thing is for certain, we need a downline to be successful in this business and the more PSA's you have the better your chance of being successful.
I have been using both but for me personally S-Builder is the better option because, depending on how many shares you get, with a standing order you are going to get a steady stream of PSA's and not all of them at once.
