Hi Michael. I do not think you are alone with this. From my own experience it appears to be a problem within the networking industry.
I hope you continue and succeed without that help
The issue is the fact that the management reward top recruiters and put their name on the growth board.
A top recruiter is not necessarily a top sponsor. Also vice versa
I belive as a BTL that is the reason for so many inactive CSA's we get awarded by the executive pool.
When I go through these I find the same sponsors name appearing, not with regularity, but to make one think it is more than a coincidence.
I try to work with my inactive CSA's but with most the damage has already been done. "Iam told I MUST have a direct debit by my sponsor, How do you know more than he does"
Within the already rich upline there is a "recruit at any cost" mentality. If they recriut for example 200 and get one that spends $36.00 in the first month the other 199 just get dumped.
So do your best my friend. Ignore you inactive sponsor Become a AWSOME sponsor your self
To be very blunt. If you are not spending they are not interested.
I call this the greed of the upline
less
Hi Michael. I do not think you are alone with this. From my own experience it appears to be a problem within the networking industry.
I hope you continue and succeed without that help
The issue is the fact that the management reward top recruiters and put their name on the growth board.
A top recruiter is not necessarily a top sponsor. Also vice versa
I belive as a BTL that is the reason for so many inactive CSA's we get awarded by the executive pool.
When I go through these
...
more
