I've experimented with each, and honestly, so far, it's a trade-off:
S-Builder has perhaps a slight advantage in the way that they target new prospects, but you never know how many you're going to get (estimates show from four to ten) or how quickly you will get yours--it's a huge co-op over a wide array of media, and unlike PSAs To Go, it's not outsourced to a third party, which means that the quality of your affiliates may prove somewhat better because they're being generated by a campaign created by people who understand SFI.
PSAs To Go generate a fixed number of affiliates and typically generate them faster, but, as noted earlier, the process of generating them is outsourced to a third party. I couldn't tell you who generates them or how, and as a result, the quality of those who sign up may be somewhat less. It's hard to tell.
To be honest, I've gotten more responsiveness from PSAs generated by S-Builder--nothing truly outstanding as yet, but I've added a share to my Standing Order as a result. Your experience may vary.
less
I've experimented with each, and honestly, so far, it's a trade-off:
S-Builder has perhaps a slight advantage in the way that they target new prospects, but you never know how many you're going to get (estimates show from four to ten) or how quickly you will get yours--it's a huge co-op over a wide array of media, and unlike PSAs To Go, it's not outsourced to a third party, which means that the quality of your affiliates may prove somewhat better because they're being generated by a campaign
...
more
